Category:Global Regulatory Development

1
United States: Mid-Year Prediction Market Report: Uncertainty Prevails Amidst Extraordinary Federal Action
2
Australia: New Protections in the Superannuation System
3
United States: Dead Rules Walking: The SEC Removes Two Zombie Rules
4
United States: Paper Cut: The SEC “FINALLY” Rethinks E-Delivery
5
China: China’s A-Share Market Expands Closing-Price Trading: Implications for Funds and Institutional Investors
6
United States: Supreme Court Scissors up Saba’s Rescission Argument Under Section 47(b) of the 1940 Act
7
United States: Supreme Court Holds SEC Does Not Need to Prove Pecuniary Loss in Disgorgement
8
United States: SEC’s Updated Qualified Client Standards Take Effect 29 June 2026
9
United States: The SEC Finally Admits It, The No-Admit/No-Deny Policy Is Gone
10
Europe: Ireland’s Private Funds Regime Gets a Major Overhaul: Central Bank Publishes Revised AIF Rulebook

United States: Mid-Year Prediction Market Report: Uncertainty Prevails Amidst Extraordinary Federal Action

Thoreau A. BartmannTamika P. BentSanjeev BhaskerTodd S. FishmanSarah V. Riddell, and Andrew M. Wright

During the first part of 2026, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or the Commission) has undertaken a sweeping campaign to protect its asserted exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets—the markets on which event contracts are traded. This effort includes a set of wide-ranging public remarks by its new chairman outlining a broad regulatory program, a set of lawsuits and case filings across the country, and a series of administrative measures, including proposed rulemakings.

Read More

Australia: New Protections in the Superannuation System

By: Daniel Knight and Jocelyn Lau

The Government has announced reforms to strengthen consumer protections and the resilience of the superannuation and financial system. These changes are being made in response to high profile investment failures but may lead to increased compliance costs for providers.

Read More

United States: Dead Rules Walking: The SEC Removes Two Zombie Rules

By: Thoreau Bartmann and Marguerite Laurent

Key Takeaways

On 4 August 2026 the SEC deleted two long dead requirements from its rulebook. SEC.gov | Investment Company Governance Technical Amendments. Specifically, the SEC deleted a requirement that 75% of a fund board be independent and that the board chair be independent, both provisions that had been struck down by a court in 2006, yet were still in the rulebook twenty years later.

Read More

United States: Paper Cut: The SEC “FINALLY” Rethinks E-Delivery

By: Thoreau A. Bartmann and Jennifer L. Klass

On 16 July 2026, the SEC proposed Regulation E-Delivery, a new rule that would make e-delivery the default for how investors receive regulatory information under the federal securities laws. Today, most required information arrives on paper unless the recipient affirmatively consents to electronic delivery. Reg E-Delivery would supersede decades of interpretive guidance built around notice, access, and evidence of delivery, reaching nearly all registrants with a delivery obligation—including advisers, registered funds, broker-dealers, and issuers—and covering nearly all required communications.

Importantly, the rule is optional. It functions as a safe harbor: firms satisfying its conditions are deemed to have fulfilled their delivery obligations, but the rule is not the exclusive means of offering e-delivery.

Read More

China: China’s A-Share Market Expands Closing-Price Trading: Implications for Funds and Institutional Investors

By: Chloe Duan and Amigo Lan Xie

Effective 6 July 2026, China’s stock exchanges implemented three significant trading rule changes aimed at improving market quality, enhancing price discovery, and facilitating long-term institutional participation. This is a further step in the continued evolution of China’s capital market microstructure and introduces features that are broadly consistent with practices in more mature international markets.

Read More

United States: Supreme Court Scissors up Saba’s Rescission Argument Under Section 47(b) of the 1940 Act

By: Thoreau A. Bartmann, Varu Chilakamarri, Jennifer R. Gonzalez, Charles M. Ponder, and Steve Topetzes

Background

The Supreme Court agreed to hear FS Credit Opportunities Corp., et al. v. Saba Capital Master fund, et al. to resolve whether Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Act) allows private parties to bring lawsuits against registered investment companies to rescind contracts (including corporate bylaws) that allegedly violate the Act.

Read More

United States: Supreme Court Holds SEC Does Not Need to Prove Pecuniary Loss in Disgorgement

By: Thoreau Bartmann, Meghan Flinn, and Steve Topetzes

On 4 June 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously decided Sripetch v. SEC, ruling that the SEC does not need to prove that victims of a securities law violation suffered pecuniary loss to obtain disgorgement.

Read More

United States: SEC’s Updated Qualified Client Standards Take Effect 29 June 2026

By: Sasha Burstein, Pablo J. Man, Mark T. Heine, Edward T. Dartley, and George Zornada

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) inflation adjustment to the qualified client thresholds under Rule 205-3 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 will become effective on 29 June 2026, and will carry important implications for SEC-registered investment advisers (RIAs) that charge performance-based compensation tied to capital gains or investment appreciation.

Read More

United States: The SEC Finally Admits It, The No-Admit/No-Deny Policy Is Gone

By: Thoreau Bartmann, Meghan Flinn, Ted Kornobis, Hayley Trahan-Liptak, and Neil Smith

On 18 May 2026, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rescinded the rule barring settling defendants from publicly denying the agency’s allegations. The policy, in place since 1972, effectively silenced settling defendants on pain of having their cases reopened. Now, defendants can publicly dispute SEC allegations, including under existing consent judgments.

Read More

Europe: Ireland’s Private Funds Regime Gets a Major Overhaul: Central Bank Publishes Revised AIF Rulebook

By: Gayle Bowen and Shane Geraghty

The Central Bank of Ireland (the Central Bank) today published its long-awaited revised AIF Rulebook, consolidating and modernising the regulatory framework for Irish alternative investment funds (AIFs). The revised Rulebook introduces a number of important flexibilities that will be welcomed by industry and will provide greater flexibility to investment managers when structuring their investment funds to better meet investors’ needs.

Read More

Copyright © 2026, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.