Category:Global Regulatory Development

1
United States: Hold on! SEC Proposes Updates to Custody Rules
2
United States: Open (Hand)book for SEC Exams: A Useful Tool for the Uninitiated
3
United States: SEC Moves to Open Private Markets to Retail Investors
4
United States: ETFs, 351, and other Good Stuff: A Ruling and a Notice
5
United States: Don’t HODL the Questions: SEC Staff Answers Questions on Crypto Taxonomy
6
United States: Mark My Words: SEC Staff Guidance on Private Credit Valuation
7
United States: Mid-Year Prediction Market Report: Uncertainty Prevails Amidst Extraordinary Federal Action
8
Australia: New Protections in the Superannuation System
9
United States: Dead Rules Walking: The SEC Removes Two Zombie Rules
10
United States: Paper Cut: The SEC “FINALLY” Rethinks E-Delivery

United States: Hold on! SEC Proposes Updates to Custody Rules

By: Thoreau A. Bartmann, Lance C. Dial, Jon-Luc Dupuy, and Pablo J. Man

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has long been concerned with investment advisers having access to client assets and investment companies’ safeguarding of fund assets. The custodial framework for investment companies dates back to 1941, and Rule 206(4)-2 (the Custody Rule) for investment advisers was adopted in 1962. Despite amendments and SEC staff guidance over the years, critics argue these rules have not been sufficiently flexible to evolve with modern markets, particularly digital assets.

Read More

United States: Open (Hand)book for SEC Exams: A Useful Tool for the Uninitiated

By: Pablo J. Man, Neil T. Smith, and Hayley Trahan-Liptak

A call from the Staff at the Division of Examinations (Exams) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the Commission) notifying a registrant of an exam has long induced uncertainty and concern, even though exams generally follow a standard playbook. Stating a goal of increased transparency and productivity, the SEC released The SEC Exam Handbook: A Practical Guide on Process and Engagement (the Handbook), which outlines a roadmap for examinations and the Commission’s expectations for registrants. For registrants who have been examined before, there will be no surprises.

Read More

United States: SEC Moves to Open Private Markets to Retail Investors

By: Jon-Luc Dupuy, Timothy C. Foley, Hannah J. Munro, and Jordan A. Knight

On 30 September 2026, the SEC proposed rule amendments advancing Chairman Paul S. Atkins’ “responsible retailization” of private markets, expanding retail access to private-market strategies while adding key investor safeguards.

Read More

United States: ETFs, 351, and other Good Stuff: A Ruling and a Notice

By: Joel D. Almquist, Edward B. Baer, and Kevin R. Gustafson

Official guidance from the IRS on Monday 28 September 2026, followed through on comments made by IRS and Treasury officials at a meeting of the Wall Street Tax Association (WSTA) back in July.

Read More

United States: Don’t HODL the Questions: SEC Staff Answers Questions on Crypto Taxonomy

By Thoreau A. Bartmann, Lance C. Dial, and Sarah V. Riddell

The SEC and its staff continue their efforts to clarify the somewhat murky regulatory environment for crypto assets. On Friday, 25 September 2026, the staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new FAQs on its March Taxonomy (the “Crypto FAQs”).

Read More

United States: Mark My Words: SEC Staff Guidance on Private Credit Valuation

By Thoreau A. Bartmann, Sasha Burstein, Lance C. Dial, Pablo J. Man, and George Zornada

On 28 September 2026, the Chief Accountant and the Director of the Division of Investment Management issued a joint statement on fair valuation of private assets (the “Statement”). On its face, it doesn’t break much ground, as it mostly restates existing guidance. However, the most important thing about this statement may be that it was issued at all. With this statement, the underlying message is clear: the SEC staff is looking for robust valuation policies and procedures coupled with material disclosures.

Read More

United States: Mid-Year Prediction Market Report: Uncertainty Prevails Amidst Extraordinary Federal Action

Thoreau A. Bartmann, Tamika P. Bent, Sanjeev Bhasker, Todd S. Fishman, Sarah V. Riddell, and Andrew M. Wright

During the first part of 2026, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or the Commission) has undertaken a sweeping campaign to protect its asserted exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets—the markets on which event contracts are traded. This effort includes a set of wide-ranging public remarks by its new chairman outlining a broad regulatory program, a set of lawsuits and case filings across the country, and a series of administrative measures, including proposed rulemakings.

Read More

Australia: New Protections in the Superannuation System

By: Daniel Knight and Jocelyn Lau

The Government has announced reforms to strengthen consumer protections and the resilience of the superannuation and financial system. These changes are being made in response to high profile investment failures but may lead to increased compliance costs for providers.

Read More

United States: Dead Rules Walking: The SEC Removes Two Zombie Rules

By: Thoreau Bartmann and Marguerite Laurent

Key Takeaways

On 4 August 2026 the SEC deleted two long dead requirements from its rulebook. SEC.gov | Investment Company Governance Technical Amendments. Specifically, the SEC deleted a requirement that 75% of a fund board be independent and that the board chair be independent, both provisions that had been struck down by a court in 2006, yet were still in the rulebook twenty years later.

Read More

United States: Paper Cut: The SEC “FINALLY” Rethinks E-Delivery

By: Thoreau A. Bartmann and Jennifer L. Klass

On 16 July 2026, the SEC proposed Regulation E-Delivery, a new rule that would make e-delivery the default for how investors receive regulatory information under the federal securities laws. Today, most required information arrives on paper unless the recipient affirmatively consents to electronic delivery. Reg E-Delivery would supersede decades of interpretive guidance built around notice, access, and evidence of delivery, reaching nearly all registrants with a delivery obligation—including advisers, registered funds, broker-dealers, and issuers—and covering nearly all required communications.

Importantly, the rule is optional. It functions as a safe harbor: firms satisfying its conditions are deemed to have fulfilled their delivery obligations, but the rule is not the exclusive means of offering e-delivery.

Read More

Copyright © 2026, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.