Archive:June 11, 2026

1
United States: Supreme Court Scissors up Saba’s Rescission Argument Under Section 47(b) of the 1940 Act
2
United States: Supreme Court Holds SEC Does Not Need to Prove Pecuniary Loss in Disgorgement
3
United States: Show Me the Money: SEC Risk Alert Highlights Advisers’ Economic Conflict

United States: Supreme Court Scissors up Saba’s Rescission Argument Under Section 47(b) of the 1940 Act

By: Thoreau A. Bartmann, Varu Chilakamarri, Jennifer R. Gonzalez, Charles M. Ponder, and Steve Topetzes

Background

The Supreme Court agreed to hear FS Credit Opportunities Corp., et al. v. Saba Capital Master fund, et al. to resolve whether Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Act) allows private parties to bring lawsuits against registered investment companies to rescind contracts (including corporate bylaws) that allegedly violate the Act.

Read More

United States: Supreme Court Holds SEC Does Not Need to Prove Pecuniary Loss in Disgorgement

By: Thoreau Bartmann, Meghan Flinn, and Steve Topetzes

On 4 June 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously decided Sripetch v. SEC, ruling that the SEC does not need to prove that victims of a securities law violation suffered pecuniary loss to obtain disgorgement.

Read More

United States: Show Me the Money: SEC Risk Alert Highlights Advisers’ Economic Conflict

By: Thoreau Bartmann, Jennifer Klass, Pablo Man, and Keri Riemer

On 9 June 2026 the SEC Division of Examinations published its second risk alert since Atkins became chair. The Risk Alert reminds investment advisers of their fiduciary obligation to disclose economic conflicts of interest that might cause advisers and their financial professionals to recommend certain products, services, or account types. Citing the SEC’s fiduciary interpretation from 2019 and longstanding examination priorities, the Risk Alert identifies the following areas of concern:

Read More

Copyright © 2026, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.