Global Investment Law Watch

Exploring the legal and regulatory issues affecting the worldwide asset management community.

 

1
Europe: New Irish Fast-Track Filing Process for Fund Name Changes To Comply With ESG-Related Rules
2
D, F, G, 3, 4, 5: Firms Charged for Failing to Make Section 13 and 16 Filings
3
Volunteer Fire Fighters: CFTC Attempts to Boost Integrity of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts With New Guidance for DCMS
4
The Fed’s Recent Interest Rate Cut: A Step in the Right Direction for PE Sponsors
5
Extension of Australia’s AML/CTF Regime to “Tranche-Two” Entities
6
DOL Fiduciary Rule: The Saga Continues With Eleventh Hour Appeal of Fiduciary Rule Stay
7
Firms Fail to File 13Fs, Fines Follow
8
End of Summer Pool Party: CFTC Approves Final Rule Amending 4.7 Regulatory Relief for CPOs and CTAs
9
After Approval at DC District Court, Appeals Court Halts Trading Event Contracts Based on Election Outcomes
10
ASIC Releases Some Additional Guidance on Greenwashing

Europe: New Irish Fast-Track Filing Process for Fund Name Changes To Comply With ESG-Related Rules

By: Áine Ní Riain and Gayle Bowen

The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has announced a streamlined filing process for Irish UCITS and AIFs seeking to change their name to comply with the European Securities and Markets Authority’s guidelines on funds’ names using ESG or sustainability-related terms (the Guidelines).

Read More

D, F, G, 3, 4, 5: Firms Charged for Failing to Make Section 13 and 16 Filings

By: Pablo J. Man, C. Todd Gibson, and Lisa N. Ju

On 25 September 2024, the SEC announced settled charges against 23 entities and individuals for failing to make timely filings about their holdings and transactions on Schedules 13D and 13G and on Forms 3, 4 and 5, pursuant to Sections 13 and 16 of the 1934 Act, respectively. The individuals charged were officers, directors and/or beneficial owners of publicly traded companies that failed to make “insider” filings. Two firms were charged for contributing to their officers’ and directors’ failures to file insider reports and for failing to comply with their own disclosure obligations to report such delinquencies. The penalties ranged from US$10,000 to US$750,000, and in the aggregate exceeded US$3.8 million.

All firms paid financial penalties and unlike the SEC’s enforcement against firms last week for their failure to file Forms 13Fs and 13H, there was no indication that any of the firms in this settlement self-reported their violations. In addition, although not included in last week’s actions, one of the firms separately settled for failing to timely file Forms 13F. The SEC indicated that its staff used data analytics to identify the charged entities and individuals as filing required reports late.

Schedules 13D and 13G are designed to provide information about the holdings of investors who beneficially own more than five percent of any registered voting class of certain equity securities (including registered closed-end funds). Meanwhile, Forms 3, 4, and 5 are designed to provide information about public company stock transactions by corporate officers, directors, or certain investors who beneficially own more than 10 percent of the stock.

The filing requirements here are not limited to asset managers or US entities and apply to investors, domestic or foreign. These enforcement actions serve as a reminder for firms to review their Section 13 obligations, and to take note of upcoming changes to Schedule 13G deadlines, and the new requirement to file after any material changes.

Volunteer Fire Fighters: CFTC Attempts to Boost Integrity of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts With New Guidance for DCMS

By Cheryl L. Isaac, Matthew J. Rogers, and Benjamin C. Skillin

On 20 September 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) released final guidance regarding the listing of voluntary carbon credit (VCC) derivative contracts on CFTC-registered exchanges known as designated contract markets (DCMs). VCCs are tradable, intangible instruments issued by a carbon crediting program and generally represent the equivalent of one metric ton of carbon dioxide avoided or removed from the atmosphere. As with other commodities, the CFTC does not have regulatory authority over VCCs, but can promulgate guidance and regulations related to derivatives on VCCs.   

Read More

The Fed’s Recent Interest Rate Cut: A Step in the Right Direction for PE Sponsors

By: Ed Dartley and Jamie M. Robinson

On 18 September 2024, the Federal Open Market Committee lowered the benchmark federal funds rate by 50 basis points to a target range of 4.75-5%. While this is welcome news on many levels, we expect that in the coming months it will have a real and positive impact on private equity sponsors, and particularly mid-sized and smaller sponsors.

Read More

Extension of Australia’s AML/CTF Regime to “Tranche-Two” Entities

By: Jim Bulling and Anthony Shorten

On 11 September 2024, the Attorney-General introduced the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) to the Federal Parliament, following two periods of consultation undertaken by the Department of the Attorney-General, and AUSTRAC over 2023 and 2024. 

Read More

DOL Fiduciary Rule: The Saga Continues With Eleventh Hour Appeal of Fiduciary Rule Stay

By: Robert L. Sichel and Ruth E. Delaney

In July, two federal district courts in Texas stayed the effective date (slated for 23 September) of the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) amended fiduciary rule that would define when a financial professional is acting as a “fiduciary” under ERISA by virtue of providing nondiscretionary investment advice to participants in 401(k) plans, IRAs, and similar clients. On Friday 20 September 2024, the DOL informed the courts that the DOL is appealing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to reverse the lower courts’ decisions. 

Read More

Firms Fail to File 13Fs, Fines Follow

By: C. Todd Gibson, Pablo J. Man, and Brian Doyle-Wenger

On 17 September 2024, the SEC announced settled charges against 11 institutional investment managers for failing to file Form 13F. In addition, two of the 11 firms also failed to file Forms 13H as large traders. The penalties ranged from US$175,000 to US$725,000, and in the aggregate exceeded US$3 million combined. However, two firms self-reported and paid no penalties and one firm self-reported Form 13H filing violations and paid no penalties on that portion of the settlement. Furthermore, all of the institutional investment managers made remedial filings covering several years (in one case over 50 such filings).

Read More

End of Summer Pool Party: CFTC Approves Final Rule Amending 4.7 Regulatory Relief for CPOs and CTAs

By: Cheryl L. Isaac, Matthew J. Rogers, and Benjamin C. Skillin

On 12 September 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) published a Final Rule impacting registered commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs) relying on the regulatory relief provided under CFTC Regulation 4.7. “Registration light,” as Regulation 4.7 is sometimes known, provides reduced disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping obligations for CPOs and CTAs that limit sales activities to “qualified eligible persons” (QEPs).

Read More

After Approval at DC District Court, Appeals Court Halts Trading Event Contracts Based on Election Outcomes

By: Cliff C. Histed, Cheryl L. Isaac, and Wiley F. Cole

On 12 September 2024, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in KalshiEx LLC v. CFTC that designated contract markets may list event contracts whose payouts are tied to the outcome of elections. The court’s order, which granted summary judgment to KalshiEx LLC (Kalshi), held that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) interpreted its own regulations too broadly and that registered derivatives exchanges such as Kalshi may offer election outcome event contracts for trading.

Read More

ASIC Releases Some Additional Guidance on Greenwashing

By: Jim Bulling and Anthony Shorten

Much of the recent media commentary on greenwashing has revolved around enforcement action taken by ASIC against entities who have misled investors or shareholders. However, there has been less discussion on best practices for entities looking to avoid greenwashing.

Read More

Copyright © 2023, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.