Global Investment Law Watch – Exploring the legal and regulatory issues affecting the worldwide investment community.

PFAR Appeal Timeline Runs Out

Jul 24 2024

The clock ran out Monday, 22 July 2024 for the SEC and its timeline to appeal the unanimous decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to vacate the Private Fund Adviser Rules (PFAR). The 2023 August adoption of PFAR and the Fifth Circuit’s 2024 June subsequent decision to vacate, has caused both controversy and compliance confusion across the private fund sector over the last few years. Even in the absence of an appeal, open questions remain surrounding the implications of future rulemaking under Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and the SEC’s stated goal to enhance transparency in the private funds space.

While the next steps for the SEC remain to be seen, managers and investors alike will still need to gauge market reaction to the core principles of PFAR and how they may drive industry initiatives separate and apart from any future regulatory efforts. For example, Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) continues to adjust the parameters of the “Quarterly Reporting Standards Initiative” which was launched in early 2024 and proposes model reporting forms that are substantively similar to what was proposed in the Quarterly Statements provision of PFAR. Now that the “wait and see” attitude on PFAR is past us, it can be expected that private fund industry participants will continue to explore the parameters of the goals that PFAR tried to achieve.

Europe: European Commission adopts Delegated Regulations for ELTIF 2.0 and rejects key changes proposed by ESMA

Jul 23 2024

By: Gayle Bowen and Shane Geraghty

The European Commission (EC) has adopted the long awaited ELTIF 2.0 Delegated Regulation (RTS). Its version rejects a number of key proposals previously introduced by ESMA. In particular, the EC has returned to its original versions of Annex I and Annex II, with minor amendments.

Australia: Payroll Tax obligations for Authorised Representatives of ACL and AFSL Holders

Jul 22 2024

By: Jim Bulling and Edwina Frost

Authorised representatives of Australian Financial Service License (AFSL) holders and credit representatives of Australian Credit Licence (ACL) holders may be deemed “contractors” for payroll tax purposes, following a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of NSW.

Europe: FCA Issues Final UK Overseas Funds Regime Rules

Jul 19 2024

By: Kai Zhang, Philip J. Morgan, Andrew J. Massey, and Hazel Doyle

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published its final rules for the UK’s Overseas Funds Regime (OFR) (see our prior blogs here and here which discuss eligibility and the expected OFR launch timetable).

Recovery and Exit Planning – Is the Superannuation Industry Ready?

Jul 18 2024

By: Claudine Salameh and Tamsyn Sharpe

From 1 January 2025, Prudential Standard CPS 190 (CPS 190) will come into effect for Registrable Superannuation Entity (RSE) licensees. These entities will be required to have detailed recovery and exit plans to support the navigation of events which may threaten their financial viability. Following a recent review of the superannuation industry’s preparedness for the commencement of CPS 190, the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) expressed the urgent need for RSE licensees to ‘consider and develop more robust and effective‘ contingency plans.

NSW Anti-Slavery Commissioner Proposes a Financial Services Code of Practice to Combat Modern Slavery

Jul 18 2024

By: Jim Bulling and Emre Cakmakcioglu

In May 2024, the NSW Anti-slavery Commissioner (Commissioner) published a Discussion Paper introducing a draft Code of Practice (Code) to reduce modern slavery in the financial services sector. The Commissioner sought feedback on both the Discussion Paper and Code by 15 July 2024.

Where to Next for ASIC? Senate Economics References Committee Releases its Report

Jul 10 2024

By: Daniel Knight and Simon Kiburg

On 3 July the Senate Economics References Committee handed down its report on ASIC. The Senate referred an inquiry into ASIC in October of 2022 to examine the capacity and capability of ASIC to undertake proportionate investigation and enforcement action arising from reports of alleged misconduct. The report is generally critical of ASIC’s performance as a corporate regulator. The report identifies several key issues. Chief among these is the broad remit of ASIC, ASICs approach to investigation and enforcement, and ASICs wider culture.

ISDA Publishes Framework to Facilitate Close-Out of Derivatives Contracts

Jul 08 2024

By: Kenneth Holston, Cheryl L. Isaac, Matthew J. Rogers, Jordan A. Knight, and Bradley D. Bostwick

On 27 June 2024, ISDA published the ISDA Close-out Framework, an interactive decision tree that market participants can use to help prepare for potential terminations of collateralized derivatives contracts that are documented under an ISDA Master Agreement. The ISDA Close-out Framework was launched in response to the March 2023 failures of Signature Bank and Silicon Valley Bank, which shed light on the complexities of terminating swaps and other over-the-counter derivatives in the multifaceted post-financial crisis swap regulatory regimes. ISDA designed this framework in response to feedback from the derivatives industry that factors such as segregated margin and stays on the exercise of termination rights and remedies makes terminating and closing out derivatives contracts increasingly complex.

Deciphering Derivatives Transaction Reporting

Jun 24 2024

By: Jim Bulling and Simon Kiburg

On 21 October 2024 the new ASIC Derivative Transaction Rules (Reporting) 2024 (2024 Rules) will come into effect replacing the current ASIC Derivative Transaction Rules (Reporting) 2022 (2022 Rules). In this post we set out some of the major changes to the 2022 Rules and some of the issues market participants in this space should be aware of.

Next Regulator Up: Treasury Department Explores AI in the Financial Sector

Jun 11 2024

By: Matthew J. Rogers and Maxwell J. Black

On 6 June 2024, the Department of the Treasury (the Treasury) published a request for information on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the financial services sector, with the goal of gathering input from a wide range of stakeholders. This request follows soon after the Treasury’s report on AI and cybersecurity.

Like other US regulators, including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Treasury is interested in understanding the opportunities and risks posed by AI, including the potential impact on consumers, investors, financial institutions, and businesses. Specifically, the Treasury is seeking feedback on the definition of AI under President Biden’s Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI, the types of AI models and tools used by financial institutions, and the general accessibility of AI.

Of particular interest is the Treasury’s query regarding a potential “human capital shortage” in financial organizations. This concerns the scenario where companies utilize AI tools without sufficient employees that fully understand their mechanisms. Additionally, the request solicits perspectives on model risks, operational risks, compliance risks, and third-party risks, among others.

This request for information shows that the Treasury is looking to augment the efforts of the CFTC, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and banking agencies, which have also requested similar AI-related information. It remains to be seen the extent to which federal agencies such as the Treasury coordinate their rulemaking processes and how any such rules will fit together.