Global Investment Law Watch – Page 5 – Exploring the legal and regulatory issues affecting the worldwide investment community.

Australia: Financial Abuse and the Need for Better Financial Services Regulation

Feb 02 2025

In December 2024 the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (the Committee) published a Report following an inquiry into how well the existing financial services regulatory framework is protecting against financial abuse. The Report highlighted a range of regulatory gaps and considered how financial institutions could better mitigate the risk of financial abuse.

Australia: ASIC Continues Increased Scrutiny Into AFS Licensees for Hire

Jan 30 2025

By: Kane Barnett and Bernard Sia

ASIC has accepted a court enforceable undertaking (CEU) from Private Wealth Pty Ltd (Sanlam) after it admitted that it failed to discharge its general Australian financial services (AFS) licensing obligations in connection with its authorised representatives.

United States: Phew! Form PF Amendments Deadline Extended (So You Can Procrastinate a Little Longer)

Jan 29 2025

By: Ruth E. Delaney and Pablo J. Man

The SEC and CFTC have extended the compliance date for their jointly adopted amendments to Form PF (originally 12 March 2025) to 12 June 2025.

United States: President Trump’s Executive Order Steering Digital Assets Policy

Jan 24 2025

By: Richard F. Kerr, Sarah V. Riddell, Cheryl Isaac, Jeremy M. McLaughlin, and Joshua L. Durham

As promised during his campaign, President Trump has taken significant steps to support the digital asset industry during his first week in office. On 23 January 2025, he signed an executive order initiating digital asset regulatory rollbacks and a new federal framework governing cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and other digital assets (the Order).

Europe: Are the UK FCA’s Revised “Name and Shame” Proposals an Improvement?

Jan 21 2025

By: Michael Ruck, Rosie Naylor, and Helen Phizackerley

In November 2024, the UK FCA released a Consultation which seeks to clarify its proposed approach to publicising ongoing enforcement action—dubbed the “name and shame” plan—and to assure the wider market of the plan’s benefits. Responses are due by 17 February 2025.

Europe: Proposed UK and EU Rules on More Research Cost Re-Bundling Move Closer

Jan 15 2025

By: Phillip Morgan, Andrew Massey, and Raghu Meena

In the United Kingdom, the FCA has proposed to give fund managers (including UCITS Mancos and full-scope UK AIFMs) an option to use fund assets to pay jointly for execution and research (so-called ‘bundled’ payments). The existing options of paying for research from manager funds or operating a customer-financed research payment account would remain. Final rules are expected in the first half of 2025. This follows the introduction on 1 August 2024 of a similar option for separate account managers as discussed here.

United States: “Oops, I was a Broker!?” SEC Cracks Down on Investment Adviser Representatives Acting as Unregistered Brokers

Jan 15 2025

By Richard Kerr, Pablo Man, Jessica Cohn, and Sydney Faehling

On 14 January 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against three investment adviser representatives for acting as unregistered brokers in the sale of membership interests in certain limited liability companies (i.e., Funds) that each purportedly owned shares of private issuers that had prospects of becoming publicly traded. The SEC separately announced settled charges against an advisory firm in a related action involving improperly managing conflicts of interests and the use of liability waivers.

Australia: ASIC Puts Insurers on Notice

Dec 13 2024

By: Claudine Salameh and Tamsyn Sharpe

ASIC has recently published its findings following an investigation into the insurance industry’s level of compliance with internal dispute resolution (IDR) obligations. Report 802 Cause for complaint: Complaints handling in general insurance revealed that general insurers are consistently falling short of their legal obligations thereby limiting customers’ ability to access fair, timely and effective IDR processes.

Australia: How Do Your Internal Dispute Resolution Processes Stack Up?

Dec 12 2024

By: Claudine Salameh and Tamsyn Sharpe

Financial firms are required to maintain clear internal dispute resolution (IDR) processes to allow customers to seek redress where they are dissatisfied with the firm’s products or services. Access to fair, timely and effective IDR is an important tenet of consumer protection. Financial firms are required to acknowledge the receipt of a customer’s complaint within 24 hours and resolve standard complaints within 30 days.

United States: Federal Court Vacates SEC’s Expanded Dealer Definition

Nov 25 2024

By: Eden L. Rohrer, Richard F. Kerr, Jessica D. Cohn, and Joshua L. Durham

On 21 November 2024, the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Court) ruled against the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in two separate cases, vacating its rule which expanded the definition of securities dealers.