Archive:2025

1
United States: Unsustainable—Acting SEC Chairman Signals Reconsideration of Climate Risk Disclosure Rules
2
In First Major Speech as Acting CFTC Chairman, Pham Describes Policy Priorities
3
Australia: Financial Abuse and the Need for Better Financial Services Regulation
4
Australia: ASIC Continues Increased Scrutiny Into AFS Licensees for Hire
5
Phew! Form PF Amendments Deadline Extended (So You Can Procrastinate a Little Longer)
6
President Trump’s Executive Order Steering Digital Assets Policy
7
Europe: Are the UK FCA’s Revised “Name and Shame” Proposals an Improvement?
8
Europe: Proposed UK and EU Rules on More Research Cost Re-Bundling Move Closer
9
“Oops, I was a Broker!?” SEC Cracks Down on Investment Adviser Representatives Acting as Unregistered Brokers

United States: Unsustainable—Acting SEC Chairman Signals Reconsideration of Climate Risk Disclosure Rules

By: Lance C. Dial and Julie F. Rizzo

In March 2024, the SEC adopted The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors final rule, which required companies to make disclosures regarding climate risks and disclosures of Scope 1 and 2 emissions information (the Climate Risk Reporting Rule). The Climate Risk Reporting Rule was promptly challenged by several lawsuits that were ultimately consolidated in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

With the change in presidential administration, it has been widely expected that the Climate Risk Reporting Rule would be rescinded and that the SEC, under new leadership, could alter its litigation strategy. On 11 February 2025, Acting SEC Chairman Uyeda did just that. He issued a statement noting that, due to “changed circumstances,” he had directed the SEC staff to request that the Eighth Circuit delay the litigation to provide time for the SEC to “deliberate and determine the appropriate next steps in these cases.” In his statement, he noted that both he and Commissioner Peirce (who now represent a majority of the SEC Commissioners) had voted against the Climate Risk Reporting Rule, and he explained his concerns regarding whether the SEC had the statutory authority to adopt the rule, the necessity of the rule, and whether the SEC had followed the appropriate procedures required under the Administrative Procedure Act.

In response to the statement put out by Acting Chairman Uyeda, Commissioner Crenshaw released a statement that the SEC did not act outside of its remit by passing the Climate Risk Reporting Rule and that Acting Chairman Uyeda acted without the full Commission’s input in making this decision.

While Acting Chairman Uyeda’s statement does not necessarily have a practical impact on the rule itself, it is an affirmative signal that this Commission is not supportive of the Climate Risk Reporting Rule and will likely take future action to rescind it. This statement, coupled with earlier statements from Paul Atkins, the President’s nominee for SEC Chairman, that were critical of the Climate Risk Reporting Rule, likely serve as confirmation of the expectations that the Climate Risk Reporting Rule will not go into effect.

In First Major Speech as Acting CFTC Chairman, Pham Describes Policy Priorities

By: Cheryl L. Isaac, Sarah V. Riddell, and Mallory M. Cooney

In a fireside chat at the ABA Futures & Derivatives Law Committee Winter Meeting on 30 January, Acting Chairman Caroline Pham shared her industry-friendly agenda for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). She described specific goals for the agency in the coming months (discussed below) and encouraged listeners to read her past dissenting statements for even more context about her priorities.

Read More

Australia: Financial Abuse and the Need for Better Financial Services Regulation

By: Claudine Salameh and Tamsyn Sharpe

In December 2024 the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (the Committee) published a Report following an inquiry into how well the existing financial services regulatory framework is protecting against financial abuse. The Report highlighted a range of regulatory gaps and considered how financial institutions could better mitigate the risk of financial abuse.

Read More

Australia: ASIC Continues Increased Scrutiny Into AFS Licensees for Hire

By: Kane Barnett and Bernard Sia

ASIC has accepted a court enforceable undertaking (CEU) from Private Wealth Pty Ltd (Sanlam) after it admitted that it failed to discharge its general Australian financial services (AFS) licensing obligations in connection with its authorised representatives.

Read More

President Trump’s Executive Order Steering Digital Assets Policy

By: Richard F. Kerr, Sarah V. Riddell, Cheryl Isaac, Jeremy M. McLaughlin, and Joshua L. Durham

As promised during his campaign, President Trump has taken significant steps to support the digital asset industry during his first week in office. On 23 January 2025, he signed an executive order initiating digital asset regulatory rollbacks and a new federal framework governing cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and other digital assets (the Order).

Read More

Europe: Are the UK FCA’s Revised “Name and Shame” Proposals an Improvement?

By: Michael Ruck, Rosie Naylor, and Helen Phizackerley

In November 2024, the UK FCA released a Consultation which seeks to clarify its proposed approach to publicising ongoing enforcement action—dubbed the “name and shame” plan—and to assure the wider market of the plan’s benefits. Responses are due by 17 February 2025.

Read More

Europe: Proposed UK and EU Rules on More Research Cost Re-Bundling Move Closer

By: Phillip Morgan, Andrew Massey, and Raghu Meena

In the United Kingdom, the FCA has proposed to give fund managers (including UCITS Mancos and full-scope UK AIFMs) an option to use fund assets to pay jointly for execution and research (so-called ‘bundled’ payments). The existing options of paying for research from manager funds or operating a customer-financed research payment account would remain. Final rules are expected in the first half of 2025. This follows the introduction on 1 August 2024 of a similar option for separate account managers as discussed here.

Read More

“Oops, I was a Broker!?” SEC Cracks Down on Investment Adviser Representatives Acting as Unregistered Brokers

By Richard Kerr, Pablo Man, Jessica Cohn, and Sydney Faehling

On 14 January 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against three investment adviser representatives for acting as unregistered brokers in the sale of membership interests in certain limited liability companies (i.e., Funds) that each purportedly owned shares of private issuers that had prospects of becoming publicly traded. The SEC separately announced settled charges against an advisory firm in a related action involving improperly managing conflicts of interests and the use of liability waivers.

Read More

Copyright © 2025, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.