Tag:Market Misconduct

1
Europe: UK FCA Confirms the Circumstances in Which it May Make Public Announcements About Live Investigations
2
Australia: Full Federal Court Finds in Favour of ASIC Appeal Concerning the Scope of the “Authorised Representative” Exemption
3
Europe: UK’s FCA Axes Proposed “Name and Shame” and D&I Requirements, and Delays Non-financial Misconduct Rules
4
Europe: UK Sanctions Regulator Highlights Compliance Failures
5
Europe: FCA Advances Efforts to Address the UK’s EU Legislative Legacy, Starting With MIFID
6
Australia: ASIC Continues Increased Scrutiny Into AFS Licensees for Hire
7
Europe: Are the UK FCA’s Revised “Name and Shame” Proposals an Improvement?
8
United States: Cooking the Books: CFTC Turns Up the Heat on Voluntary Carbon Market Fraudsters
9
United States: Extra Credit Projects: SEC Settles Charges Against Carbon Offset Project Developer for US$250 Million Offering Fraud
10
United States: D, F, G, 3, 4, 5: Firms Charged for Failing to Make Section 13 and 16 Filings

Europe: UK FCA Confirms the Circumstances in Which it May Make Public Announcements About Live Investigations

By: Michael E. Ruck, Rosie Naylor, Jordan Hawthorne, and Laura Scott

We discussed in an earlier blog that the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority has axed proposed “name and shame” rules, retaining only an ability to make a public announcement about an investigation in “exceptional circumstances”. It has now published a revised Enforcement Guide which also details three specific circumstances in which it may make an announcement:

Read More

Australia: Full Federal Court Finds in Favour of ASIC Appeal Concerning the Scope of the “Authorised Representative” Exemption

By: Kane Barnett and Isaac Gilmore

The Full Federal Court (the Court) has ruled in favour of the Australian Securities and Investments Commissions’ (ASIC) appeal as to whether BPS Financial Pty Ltd (BPS) could rely on the ‘authorised representative’ exemption in relation to issuing their ‘Qoin Wallet’ product (see our previous post for background). The authorised representative exemption is commonly relied upon and allows a person or entity to provide a financial service under the Corporations Act on behalf of the holder of an Australian financial services licence (AFS licence) without having to hold an AFS licence itself. 

Read More

Europe: UK’s FCA Axes Proposed “Name and Shame” and D&I Requirements, and Delays Non-financial Misconduct Rules

By: Michael E. Ruck, and Laura Scott

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority had proposed a so-called “name and shame” approach that would have allowed it, subject to certain safeguards, to disclose its investigations into firms publicly at an early stage (see our earlier blog); however, following significant criticism from the financial industry and Parliament—largely highlighting risks that early disclosure could potentially cause irreversible damage to firms, including those later cleared of any wrongdoing—the FCA has abandoned the proposal.

Read More

Europe: UK Sanctions Regulator Highlights Compliance Failures

By: Michael E. Ruck, Rosie L. Naylor, Petr Bartos, Helen J. Phizackerley, and Laura Scott

On 13 February 2025, the UK’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) published an assessment of suspected sanctions breaches involving UK financial services firms since February 2022. It highlights three areas of concern:

Read More

Europe: FCA Advances Efforts to Address the UK’s EU Legislative Legacy, Starting With MIFID

By: Philip Morgan, Andrew Massey, and Harriet Sherwin

Following an HM Treasury policy statement, the FCA has published a consultation paper proposing amendments to some of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID) conduct of business and systems and controls rules inherited from the EU that continue to exist in the UK statute book in close to their original form.

Read More

Australia: ASIC Continues Increased Scrutiny Into AFS Licensees for Hire

By: Kane Barnett

ASIC has accepted a court enforceable undertaking (CEU) from Private Wealth Pty Ltd (Sanlam) after it admitted that it failed to discharge its general Australian financial services (AFS) licensing obligations in connection with its authorised representatives.

Read More

Europe: Are the UK FCA’s Revised “Name and Shame” Proposals an Improvement?

By: Michael Ruck and Rosie Naylor

In November 2024, the UK FCA released a Consultation which seeks to clarify its proposed approach to publicising ongoing enforcement action—dubbed the “name and shame” plan—and to assure the wider market of the plan’s benefits. Responses are due by 17 February 2025.

Read More

United States: Cooking the Books: CFTC Turns Up the Heat on Voluntary Carbon Market Fraudsters

By: Cheryl L. Isaac and Clifford C. Histed

On 2 October 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced multiple actions related to fraud in the voluntary carbon credit (VCC) market, just over one year after establishing the Environmental Fraud Task Force. Specifically, the CFTC filed a complaint in federal court against the former CEO of a carbon credit project developer and, on the same day, settled charges against CQC Impact Investors LLC (CQC) and its former COO, all related to a deceptive scheme purportedly intended to reduce carbon emissions. 

Read More

United States: Extra Credit Projects: SEC Settles Charges Against Carbon Offset Project Developer for US$250 Million Offering Fraud

By: Pablo Man

On 2 October 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against one of the largest carbon credit project developers (the Developer), for fraudulently altering data concerning its business and making material misrepresentations in the offering of equity to institutional investors in the United States. The SEC’s order found that the Developer violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.  

Read More

United States: D, F, G, 3, 4, 5: Firms Charged for Failing to Make Section 13 and 16 Filings

By: Pablo J. Man, C. Todd Gibson, and Lisa N. Ju

On 25 September 2024, the SEC announced settled charges against 23 entities and individuals for failing to make timely filings about their holdings and transactions on Schedules 13D and 13G and on Forms 3, 4 and 5, pursuant to Sections 13 and 16 of the 1934 Act, respectively. The individuals charged were officers, directors and/or beneficial owners of publicly traded companies that failed to make “insider” filings. Two firms were charged for contributing to their officers’ and directors’ failures to file insider reports and for failing to comply with their own disclosure obligations to report such delinquencies. The penalties ranged from US$10,000 to US$750,000, and in the aggregate exceeded US$3.8 million.

Read More

Copyright © 2025, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.