Category:Distribution

1
Australia: Full Federal Court Finds in Favour of ASIC Appeal Concerning the Scope of the “Authorised Representative” Exemption
2
United States: SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance Clarifies That Participation in Certain Proof-Of-Stake Activities Does Not Require SEC Registration
3
Europe: Ireland Agrees Mutual Recognition of Funds Framework With Hong Kong
4
United States: New Kid on Y’all’s Block
5
Australia: Review Recommends No Increases to Wholesale Client Test, Encourages Further Review
6
Europe: Irish Central Bank Discusses Its Approach to Exchange Traded Funds
7
Europe: BaFin Changes Its Process for Fund Passporting Into Germany
8
Australia: ASIC Seeks to Clarify the Scope of the “Authorised Representative” Exemption
9
Europe: Central Bank of Ireland Changing Notification Procedure for UCITS and AIF Passporting Applications
10
Europe: FCA Amends Opening Date for Registration of New UCITS Schemes Under UK Overseas Fund Regime

Australia: Full Federal Court Finds in Favour of ASIC Appeal Concerning the Scope of the “Authorised Representative” Exemption

By: Kane Barnett and Isaac Gilmore

The Full Federal Court (the Court) has ruled in favour of the Australian Securities and Investments Commissions’ (ASIC) appeal as to whether BPS Financial Pty Ltd (BPS) could rely on the ‘authorised representative’ exemption in relation to issuing their ‘Qoin Wallet’ product (see our previous post for background). The authorised representative exemption is commonly relied upon and allows a person or entity to provide a financial service under the Corporations Act on behalf of the holder of an Australian financial services licence (AFS licence) without having to hold an AFS licence itself. 

Read More

United States: SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance Clarifies That Participation in Certain Proof-Of-Stake Activities Does Not Require SEC Registration

By: Richard F. Kerr, Keri E. Riemer, and Caroline N. Roethlisberger

On 29 May 2025, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (the Division) issued a guidance statement (Statement) related to certain protocol staking activities. The Statement addresses the impact of federal securities laws on staking of crypto assets on networks that use proof-of-stake (PoS) as a consensus mechanism (PoS Networks). Such activity is referred to as “Protocol Staking” and such assets, “Covered Crypto Assets.”

Specifically, the Division stated that (i) staking Covered Crypto Assets on a PoS Network; (ii) the activities undertaken by third parties involved in the Protocol Staking process (including third-party node operators, validators, custodians, delegates and nominators); and (iii) providing certain ancillary services related to Protocol Staking in the manner described in the Statement do not involve the offer and sale of securities within the meaning of Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) or Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, therefore, do not need to register under the Securities Act, or fall within an exemption from registration.

The Statement provides guidance solely with respect to Protocol Staking activities undertaken in connection with self (or solo) staking, self-custodial staking directly with a third party and through custodial arrangements. The Statement does not cover instances where a custodian selects whether, when, or how much of an owner’s crypto assets to stake.

With respect to ancillary services, the Statement provides that service providers—including custodians—may engage in activities that are ministerial or administrative in nature, including providing slashing coverage, early unbonding, alternate rewards payment schedule and amounts, and the aggregation of crypto assets.

The Statement follows recent guidance from the Division providing greater clarity on the application of the federal securities laws to digital assets, including an FAQ that addresses broker-dealer custody of digital assets.

Europe: Ireland Agrees Mutual Recognition of Funds Framework With Hong Kong

By: Michelle Lloyd and Shane Geraghty

The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) and the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (SFC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on 14 May 2025 establishing a framework for the mutual recognition of funds (MRF) between the two jurisdictions.

Read More

United States: New Kid on Y’all’s Block

By: Stacy L. Fuller, Kevin R. Gustafson, Richard F. Kerr, Jessica D. Cohn, and Christine Mikhael

On 31 January 2025, the Texas Stock Exchange LLC (TXSE) filed a registration statement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to operate as a fully electronic, national securities exchange.

Read More

Australia: Review Recommends No Increases to Wholesale Client Test, Encourages Further Review

By: Kane Barnett and Bernard Sia

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (Committee) has been inquiring into the wholesale investor test for offers of securities, and the wholesale client test for financial products and services in the Corporations Act 2001 (Inquiry) (see our previous post). The Committee has now released its report from the Inquiry.

Read More

Europe: Irish Central Bank Discusses Its Approach to Exchange Traded Funds

By Hazel Doyle and Nicola McCaffrey

In an important speech, Derville Rowland, the Central Bank of Ireland’s Deputy Governor for Consumer and Investor Protection has outlined the Central Bank’s approach to ETFs in Ireland. Some of the points she made are highlighted in this blog.

Read More

Europe: BaFin Changes Its Process for Fund Passporting Into Germany

By: Hilger Von Livonius, Emma O’Dwyer, Aoife Maguire, and Gayle Bowen

On 14 and 15 August 2024, the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) updated the following guidance notices:

Guidance Notice on marketing of EU UCITS in Germany

Guidance Notice (2013) for marketing units or shares of EU AIFs or domestic special AIFs (Spezial-AIF) managed by an EU AIF management company to semi-professional and professional investors in the Federal Republic of Germany pursuant to section 323 of the Investment Code

Read More

Australia: ASIC Seeks to Clarify the Scope of the “Authorised Representative” Exemption

By: Kane Barnett and Daniel Nastasi

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has appealed certain findings in the recent decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v BPS Financial Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 457 (BPS Financial Decision) in relation to the scope of the authorised representative exemption. The authorised representative exemption is commonly relied upon and allows a person or entity to provide a financial service under the Corporations Act on behalf of the holder of an AFS licence without having to hold an AFS licence itself. 

Read More

Europe: Central Bank of Ireland Changing Notification Procedure for UCITS and AIF Passporting Applications

By: Gayle Bowen, Emma O’Dwyer, and Aoife Maguire

The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) is changing the process for the submission of UCITS and AIF passport notifications and de-notifications.

Read More

Europe: FCA Amends Opening Date for Registration of New UCITS Schemes Under UK Overseas Fund Regime

By: Emma O’Dwyer, Aoife Maguire, and Gayle Bowen

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority has put back the opening date for the application gateway for recognition of new UCITS schemes (i.e. those schemes not already registered under the Temporary Marketing Permissions Regime) under the OFR.

Read More

Copyright © 2025, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.